This is a family-friendly place where everyone respects each other even (and especially) if you disagree.
Keep all content suitable for general audiences 14 years and older. Be sure to read the Unicorn Network Terms, and Privacy policies, and check the SafeZone Support area in WazzUb if you have more questions on what exactly is suitable or not.
There is ZERO tolerance for cheating, fraud, hate, violence, drugs, crimes, porn (including sexualization of minors), and disrespect. PRO or NO! Administration (including moderators) will remove any post that does not fit within our terms or rules at any time with or without notice. Violators will be banned temporarily and repeated violators will be permanently banned from PRO or NO!; for those who violate, the first ban is for 1 week, second ban is for 30 days, and the third ban is forever.
No links to any websites, no emojis, and no hashtags are allowed. This is a platform for pure communication.
Statements and comments must be original content, no copying from any other source especially other websites is allowed.
Remember the Unicorn Network 8 Core Values (Respect, Privacy, Security, Quality, Benefits, Influence, Family, Charity) and keep your posts in line with that.
Defamatory posts against anyone including SafeZone, Unicorn Network and associated teams, partners, members, and affiliates are not allowed. If you have a Support issue, please contact the SafeZone Support via the SUPPORT hexagon at Safe.Zone for assistance.
PRO or NO! Administration reserves the right to take action as they deem appropriate when rules are violated, other members' enjoyment of the PRO or NO! platform is affected, or otherwise as needed.
These rules will be updated as needed with or without notice and it is your responsibility to stay up to date and keep within the rules.
Last update: September 12, 2020
All rights reserved.
Should there be universal access for Authorities to access DNA into Family Ancestries websites for serious crime
0
0
added by Anonymous 716 days ago
At the moment, police forces are likely to have difficulty getting access to the vast databases of 23andMe and Ancestry.com, because people whose profiles are stored there didn’t know they might be used for law enforcement and couldn’t therefore have given their consent. But allowing the police to access DNA data helps them to easily resolve issues which might be contradicting.
0
0
added by Anonymous 823 days ago
It should because in future references May be needed for others in the same linahe of the family, instead of doing the same afresh it will save time and money.
0
0
added by Anonymous 1219 days ago
This section of the chapter explains when the police can require you to give them a sample of your DNA, which is done by getting a small blood sample from your finger or by swabbing the inside of your mouth. This section also explains the rules the police have to follow when they get a sample.
The police can require you to give a DNA sample if they’ve arrested you for a criminal offence that carries a possible jail term, or if they intend to charge you with one of those offences. If you’re a suspect but they don’t have enough evidence to arrest you or charge you, they can ask you to give a sample voluntarily, and if you refuse they can only get a sample from you if they go to a judge and get a court order – called a “compulsion order”
added by Anonymous 1347 days ago