This is a family-friendly place where everyone respects each other even (and especially) if you disagree.
Keep all content suitable for general audiences 14 years and older. Be sure to read the Unicorn Network Terms, and Privacy policies, and check the SafeZone Support area in WazzUb if you have more questions on what exactly is suitable or not.
There is ZERO tolerance for cheating, fraud, hate, violence, drugs, crimes, porn (including sexualization of minors), and disrespect. PRO or NO! Administration (including moderators) will remove any post that does not fit within our terms or rules at any time with or without notice. Violators will be banned temporarily and repeated violators will be permanently banned from PRO or NO!; for those who violate, the first ban is for 1 week, second ban is for 30 days, and the third ban is forever.
No links to any websites, no emojis, and no hashtags are allowed. This is a platform for pure communication.
Statements and comments must be original content, no copying from any other source especially other websites is allowed.
Remember the Unicorn Network 8 Core Values (Respect, Privacy, Security, Quality, Benefits, Influence, Family, Charity) and keep your posts in line with that.
Defamatory posts against anyone including SafeZone, Unicorn Network and associated teams, partners, members, and affiliates are not allowed. If you have a Support issue, please contact the SafeZone Support via the SUPPORT hexagon at Safe.Zone for assistance.
PRO or NO! Administration reserves the right to take action as they deem appropriate when rules are violated, other members' enjoyment of the PRO or NO! platform is affected, or otherwise as needed.
These rules will be updated as needed with or without notice and it is your responsibility to stay up to date and keep within the rules.
Last update: September 12, 2020
All rights reserved.
Just because we can count something as climate performance does not mean we should. Both approaches from the two major parties have their own issues
added by Anonymous 660 days ago 0 0
Broadly, carbon credits work as a certificate permitting someone to emit greenhouse gases. To assess Australia's performance, it's important to understand the differences between the types of certificate. Just because we can count something as climate performance does not mean we should. Both approaches from the two major parties have their own issues, but that does not mean they are equal.
added by Anonymous 767 days ago 0 0
The federal environment department says it is not aware of any countries other than Australia planning to use controversial “carryover credits” to meet international climate commitments.
The comment, at a Senate estimates hearing on Monday, comes as the Morrison government rebuffs calls from international leaders, analysts and activists for it to abandon the use the credits to meet its 2030 Paris emissions goal.
The government says it has earned the right to use the credits, which represent the amount of carbon dioxide by which Australia has “beaten” the targets set under the previous international climate agreement, the Kyoto protocol.
added by Anonymous 1230 days ago 2 0